IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)vsSASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)
See exactly how IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls map to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) maps to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) with 22% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
Financial Risk(3 mappings)
Knowledge Management Risk(1 mappings)
Operational Risk(3 mappings)
Risk Management Process(6 mappings)
Strategic Risk(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons
Other SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) has 36 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process, where 6 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) equivalent.
How many controls map between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
Of 36 total IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls, 8 map directly to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
28 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated). The highest concentration of gaps is in Process with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Process (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.