Cross-Framework Mapping

Indiana Consumer Data Protection ActvsLGPD

See exactly how Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls map to LGPD. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

47
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act maps to LGPD with 32% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Consumer rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act: Data Collection & Consent(20 mappings)

IN-CDPA-02Consent management and withdrawal8 targets
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
Art.20Service Provider Duties
Art.7Children's Data
LGPD-13Encryption of personal data
LGPD-15Access control for personal data
LGPD-16Data breach notification requirements
LGPD-19Data protection officer designation
LGPD-21Data protection impact assessments
IN-CDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification8 targets
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
Art.20Service Provider Duties
Art.7Children's Data
LGPD-13Encryption of personal data
LGPD-15Access control for personal data
LGPD-16Data breach notification requirements
LGPD-19Data protection officer designation
LGPD-21Data protection impact assessments
IN-CDPA-05Data minimization requirements4 targets
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
Art.20Service Provider Duties
Art.7Children's Data
LGPD-13Encryption of personal data

+27 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and LGPD?

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act has 47 controls across its framework, while LGPD covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Consumer rights, where 8 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct LGPD equivalent.

How many controls map between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and LGPD?

Of 47 total Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls, 15 map directly to LGPD controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act to LGPD?

32 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct equivalent in LGPD. The highest concentration of gaps is in Consumer rights with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and LGPD?

The domain with the highest gap count is Consumer rights (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.