Cross-Framework Mapping

Indiana Consumer Data Protection ActvsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)

See exactly how Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls map to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act maps to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Indiana CDPA Consumer Rights(1 mappings)

INCDPA-ConsumerRights-Access-Correction-Deletion-Portability-OptOut-TargetedAd-Sale-Profiling-Appeal-45DayIndiana CDPA Consumer Rights - Access + Correction + Deletion + Portability + Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising/Sale/Profiling + 45-Day Response + 45-Day Extension + Authorised Agent + Appeal Process
DIQ-1Data Integration and Interoperability

Indiana CDPA Processor Contracts(2 mappings)

INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance2 targets
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
DIQ-3Metadata Management

Indiana CDPA Security + Breach + Records(4 mappings)

INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification4 targets
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
DIQ-3Metadata Management
DSO-2Data Security
DSO-3Data Access Management

Related Comparisons

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Other DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act has 8 controls across its framework, while DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional, where 1 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) equivalent.

How many controls map between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

Of 8 total Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls, 3 map directly to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act to DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

5 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct equivalent in DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). The highest concentration of gaps is in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.