Cross-Framework Mapping

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)vsC2M2

See exactly how German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls map to C2M2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) maps to C2M2 with 62% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10)(2 mappings)

LkSG-10.1Annual Reporting
C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities
LkSG-10.2Public Disclosure
C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities

Risk Management System (Section 4)(3 mappings)

LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment
C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)2 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Policy and Prevention (Sections 6-7)(8 mappings)

LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business2 targets
C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers3 targets
C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
C2M2-23Change management procedures
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence3 targets
C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
C2M2-23Change management procedures
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Remedial Action (Section 8)(3 mappings)

LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers3 targets
C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
C2M2-23Change management procedures
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and C2M2?

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) has 13 controls across its framework, while C2M2 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10), where 2 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls have no direct C2M2 equivalent.

How many controls map between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and C2M2?

Of 13 total German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls, 8 map directly to C2M2 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) to C2M2?

5 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls have no direct equivalent in C2M2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10) with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and C2M2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10) (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.