FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024
See exactly how FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 with 35% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
Risk Assessment and Safeguard Design(20 mappings)
+20 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Other Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024?
FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 52 controls across its framework, while Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 covers 88 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 6 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 equivalent.
How many controls map between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024?
Of 52 total FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 18 map directly to Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024?
34 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.