Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsUK Modern Slavery Act 2015

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to UK Modern Slavery Act 2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 with 31% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(11 mappings)

FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
s.54(5)Statement Content Requirements
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
s.54(5)Statement Content Requirements
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions3 targets
BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition
s.42Commissioner's Annual Report
s.54(5)Statement Content Requirements
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection3 targets
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification

Purpose, Scope and Definitions(3 mappings)

Sec. 314.1Purpose and scope
BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information2 targets
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Information Security Programme Standards(1 mappings)

Sec. 314.3(a)Comprehensive information security programme
BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition

Safeguard Elements(1 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Modern Slavery Act 2015?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 9 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Modern Slavery Act 2015?

Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 11 map directly to UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to UK Modern Slavery Act 2015?

25 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Modern Slavery Act 2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Modern Slavery Act 2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.