TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsEU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review with 17% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(3 mappings)

FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions3 targets
→PSR Art. 13Pre-contractual information requirements
→PSR Art. 88Operational and security risk management
→PSR Art. 90Fraud prevention measures

Purpose, Scope and Definitions(9 mappings)

Sec. 314.1Purpose and scope3 targets
→PSR Art. 13Pre-contractual information requirements
→PSR Art. 88Operational and security risk management
→PSR Art. 90Fraud prevention measures
Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution3 targets
→PSD3 Art. 18Winding-up plan requirement
→PSD3 Art. 20Withdrawal of authorisation
→PSR Art. 86Exemptions from strong customer authentication
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information3 targets
→PSD3 Art. 18Winding-up plan requirement
→PSD3 Art. 20Withdrawal of authorisation
→PSR Art. 86Exemptions from strong customer authentication

Information Security Programme Standards(3 mappings)

Sec. 314.3(a)Comprehensive information security programme3 targets
→PSR Art. 13Pre-contractual information requirements
→PSR Art. 88Operational and security risk management
→PSR Art. 90Fraud prevention measures

Safeguard Elements(3 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication3 targets
→PSR Art. 83Strong customer authentication
→PSR Art. 85Dynamic linking for remote transactions
→PSR Art. 86Exemptions from strong customer authentication

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CSA CCM v420 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)19 mappings

Other EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review comparisons

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review8 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review8 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review8 mappingsDigital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review8 mappingsIFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review6 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review6 mappingsBank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review6 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 15 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review?

Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 6 map directly to EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review?

30 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.