TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and StandardsvsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards maps to CSA CCM v4 with 29% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Area 4: Situational Awareness.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Service Area 2: Information Security Incident Management(14 mappings)

FIRST-SA2.3Incident Coordination3 targets
→CSA-LOG-02Security incident management
→CSA-SEF-02Service management policy and procedures
→CSA-SEF-03Incident response plans
FIRST-SA2.4Incident Response Support5 targets
→CSA-BCR-08Backup
→CSA-CEK-20Key recovery
→CSA-LOG-02Security incident management
→CSA-SEF-02Service management policy and procedures
→CSA-SEF-03Incident response plans
FIRST-SA2.5Crisis Management Support6 targets
→CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
→CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
→CSA-BCR-05Documentation
→CSA-LOG-02Security incident management
→CSA-SEF-02Service management policy and procedures
→CSA-SEF-03Incident response plans

Service Area 3: Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

FIRST-SA3.3Vulnerability Response Coordination
→CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management

Service Area 5: Knowledge Transfer(1 mappings)

FIRST-SA5.1Awareness Building
→CSA-HRS-11Security awareness training

Related Comparisons

Other FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards comparisons

FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)5 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments5 mappings

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA CCM v446 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs CSA CCM v442 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs CSA CCM v442 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v442 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and CSA CCM v4?

FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards has 17 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Area 4: Situational Awareness, where 3 FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and CSA CCM v4?

Of 17 total FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards controls, 5 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards to CSA CCM v4?

12 FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Area 4: Situational Awareness with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Area 4: Situational Awareness (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.