Cross-Framework Mapping

FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)vsSWIFT CSCF

See exactly how FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) controls map to SWIFT CSCF. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) maps to SWIFT CSCF with 38% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in QMSR: Transition Plan from Prior QSR, FDA Inspection Approach, Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 354K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 354K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

QMSR: Quality Management System Requirements (§820.10 incorporating ISO 13485:2016 Sec. 4-8)(14 mappings)

QMSR-820.10Requirements for a Quality Management System - ISO 13485:2016 Sections 4-8 incorporation (§820.10)2 targets
1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
3.1Physical Security
QMSR-ISO13485-Sec5Management responsibility (ISO 13485:2016 Section 5 - incorporated via §820.10)2 targets
1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection
QMSR-ISO13485-Sec6Resource management (ISO 13485:2016 Section 6 - incorporated via §820.10)4 targets
3.1Physical Security
4.1Password Policy
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
QMSR-ISO13485-Sec7_PurchasingPurchasing controls + supplier management (ISO 13485:2016 Section 7.4)4 targets
3.1Physical Security
4.1Password Policy
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
QMSR-ISO13485-Sec8Measurement, analysis and improvement (ISO 13485:2016 Section 8)2 targets
1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
3.1Physical Security

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (354K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) and SWIFT CSCF?

FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) has 13 controls across its framework, while SWIFT CSCF covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in QMSR: Transition Plan from Prior QSR, FDA Inspection Approach, Status, where 2 FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) controls have no direct SWIFT CSCF equivalent.

How many controls map between FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) and SWIFT CSCF?

Of 13 total FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) controls, 5 map directly to SWIFT CSCF controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) to SWIFT CSCF?

8 FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) controls have no direct equivalent in SWIFT CSCF. The highest concentration of gaps is in QMSR: Transition Plan from Prior QSR, FDA Inspection Approach, Status with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) and SWIFT CSCF?

The domain with the highest gap count is QMSR: Transition Plan from Prior QSR, FDA Inspection Approach, Status (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.