FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsISO 22316
See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to ISO 22316. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to ISO 22316 with 6% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.
Detection, Response and Recovery(2 mappings)
Cybersecurity Governance(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Other ISO 22316 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 725 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 22316?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 52 controls across its framework, while ISO 22316 covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 14 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct ISO 22316 equivalent.
How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 22316?
Of 52 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 3 map directly to ISO 22316 controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to ISO 22316?
49 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22316. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and ISO 22316?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.