Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023)vsFATF 40 Recommendations
See exactly how Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls map to FATF 40 Recommendations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) maps to FATF 40 Recommendations with 7% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in EITI: Revenue Collection (Section 4).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
EITI: Legal and Institutional Framework, Contracts and Licences, Beneficial Ownership, State Participation (Section 2)(1 mappings)
A Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) to FATF 40 Recommendations crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FATF 40 Recommendations controls your existing Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 7% in the header counts how many Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FATF 40 Recommendations controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) comparisons
Other FATF 40 Recommendations comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) and FATF 40 Recommendations?
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) has 15 controls across its framework, while FATF 40 Recommendations covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EITI: Revenue Collection (Section 4), where 3 Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls have no direct FATF 40 Recommendations equivalent.
How many controls map between Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) and FATF 40 Recommendations?
Of 15 total Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls, 1 map directly to FATF 40 Recommendations controls, representing 7% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) to FATF 40 Recommendations?
14 Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in FATF 40 Recommendations. The highest concentration of gaps is in EITI: Revenue Collection (Section 4) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard (2023) and FATF 40 Recommendations?
The domain with the highest gap count is EITI: Revenue Collection (Section 4) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.