EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)vsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)
See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls map to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) maps to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) with 17% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 59 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Environmental Objectives.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 59 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.
Environmental Objectives(1 mappings)
Cross-Cutting Provisions(4 mappings)
Chapter I - Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)
Chapter III - Final Provisions(3 mappings)
Chapter II - Environmentally Sustainable Economic Activities(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons
Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 725 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?
EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) has 59 controls across its framework, while Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Environmental Objectives, where 18 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?
Of 59 total EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls, 10 map directly to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?
49 EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls have no direct equivalent in Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). The highest concentration of gaps is in Environmental Objectives with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Environmental Objectives (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.