Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114)vsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)

See exactly how EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) controls map to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) maps to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Market Abuse Prevention.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supervision, Enforcement and Final Provisions(2 mappings)

Art. 111Administrative Fines — Serious Violations2 targets
BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties
BE-DPA-7Article 23 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority

Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Asset-Referenced Tokens(6 mappings)

Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach3 targets
BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing
BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines
BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data
Art. 35Right of Access3 targets
BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing
BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines
BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data

Crypto-Assets Other Than Asset-Referenced or E-Money Tokens(2 mappings)

Art. 4Participating Institutions2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

E-Money Tokens(5 mappings)

Art. 48Criminal Penalties2 targets
BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties
BE-DPA-7Article 23 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution3 targets
BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing
BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines
BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data

Market Abuse Prevention(3 mappings)

Art. 91Prohibition of market manipulation2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
MICA-ART89Prohibition of Insider Dealing
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) has 35 controls across its framework, while Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Market Abuse Prevention, where 6 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) controls have no direct Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

Of 35 total EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) controls, 9 map directly to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

26 EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Market Abuse Prevention with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Market Abuse Prevention (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.