Cross-Framework Mapping

EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC)vsIndia Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)

See exactly how EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) controls map to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) maps to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Scope and Definitions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)

64.2003Definitions
AA-ECO-3Interoperability
Art. 2Consent Definition
AA-ECO-3Interoperability

Subscriber Rights(2 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements
AA-ECO-3Interoperability
Art. 12Data Ownership
AA-CON-3Purpose Limitation

Security and Confidentiality(1 mappings)

Art. 4Participating Institutions
AA-ECO-3Interoperability

Traffic and Location Data(4 mappings)

Art. 7Minimum Standards
AA-ECO-3Interoperability
Art. 8Data Categories2 targets
AA-CON-3Purpose Limitation
AA-ECO-3Interoperability
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
AA-ECO-3Interoperability

Related Comparisons

Other EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) comparisons

Other India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) has 22 controls across its framework, while India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Scope and Definitions, where 5 EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) controls have no direct India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

Of 22 total EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) controls, 8 map directly to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) to India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

14 EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) controls have no direct equivalent in India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Scope and Definitions with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) and India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Scope and Definitions (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.