EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38)vsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule
See exactly how EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) controls map to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) maps to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule with 50% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cyber Emergency Mechanism.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Cyber Emergency Mechanism(11 mappings)
Final Provisions(5 mappings)
General Objectives and Definitions(4 mappings)
+9 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) comparisons
Other FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) has 22 controls across its framework, while FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cyber Emergency Mechanism, where 4 EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) controls have no direct FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
Of 22 total EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) controls, 11 map directly to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
11 EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) controls have no direct equivalent in FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cyber Emergency Mechanism with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cyber Emergency Mechanism (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.