TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EU AI Liability DirectivevsEU AI Act

See exactly how EU AI Liability Directive controls map to EU AI Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU AI Liability Directive maps to EU AI Act with 56% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 EU AI Liability Directive controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AILD - Transposition and Entry into Force (Articles 7-9).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

AILD - Scope and Definitions(2 mappings)

AILD-Art.1Subject matter and scope
→EUAI-Art.1-4Subject matter, scope, definitions and AI literacy
AILD-Art.2Definitions (aligned with the AI Act)
→EUAI-Art.1-4Subject matter, scope, definitions and AI literacy

AILD - Disclosure of Evidence (Article 3)(8 mappings)

AILD-Art.3.1Disclosure of evidence on request (Article 3(1))3 targets
→EUAI-Art.11Technical documentation
→EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
AILD-Art.3.2Plausibility threshold and disclosure from non-defendants (Article 3(2))
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
AILD-Art.3.3Preservation of evidence (Article 3(3))2 targets
→EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
AILD-Art.3.4Proportionality and trade-secret protection (Article 3(4))
→EUAI-Art.11Technical documentation
AILD-Art.3.5Presumption of non-compliance on refusal to disclose (Article 3(5))
→EUAI-Art.16-22Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems and authorised representatives

AILD - Causal-Link Presumption (Article 4)(10 mappings)

AILD-Art.4.1Rebuttable presumption of a causal link (Article 4(1))2 targets
→EUAI-Art.16-22Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems and authorised representatives
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
AILD-Art.4.2Conditions for the presumption (high-risk AI systems, Article 4(2))8 targets
→EUAI-Art.10Data and data governance
→EUAI-Art.11Technical documentation
→EUAI-Art.13Transparency and provision of information to deployers
→EUAI-Art.14Human oversight
→EUAI-Art.15Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity
→EUAI-Art.16-22Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems and authorised representatives
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
→EUAI-Art.6-7Classification rules for high-risk AI systems

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 725 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EU AI Liability Directive comparisons

EU AI Liability Directive vs EU Product Liability Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/2845)5 mappingsEU AI Liability Directive vs GDPR3 mappings

Other EU AI Act comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs EU AI Act10 mappingsGDPR vs EU AI Act5 mappingsRwanda Law No. 058/2021 Relating to the Protection of Personal Data vs EU AI Act2 mappingsEU Cyber Resilience Act vs EU AI Act1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 725 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EU AI Liability Directive and EU AI Act?

EU AI Liability Directive has 18 controls across its framework, while EU AI Act covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AILD - Transposition and Entry into Force (Articles 7-9), where 3 EU AI Liability Directive controls have no direct EU AI Act equivalent.

How many controls map between EU AI Liability Directive and EU AI Act?

Of 18 total EU AI Liability Directive controls, 10 map directly to EU AI Act controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Liability Directive to EU AI Act?

8 EU AI Liability Directive controls have no direct equivalent in EU AI Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in AILD - Transposition and Entry into Force (Articles 7-9) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Liability Directive and EU AI Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is AILD - Transposition and Entry into Force (Articles 7-9) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.