TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020)vsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) controls map to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) maps to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data with 32% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Chapter 1 - Definitions(7 mappings)

AVSEC-1.1Definitions2 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
AVSEC-1.2Scope and Application2 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

Chapter 4 - Rights of Data Subjects(13 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 12Record-Keeping5 targets
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements7 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) comparisons

Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience17 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs EU AI Act17 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)16 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)16 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality16 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule16 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles16 mappingsEgypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) vs Turkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK — Law No. 6698)16 mappings

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

LGPD vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsAPPI vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsTexas Data Privacy Act vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) has 50 controls across its framework, while Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk, where 2 Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) controls have no direct Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 50 total Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) controls, 16 map directly to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

34 Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) controls have no direct equivalent in Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020) and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.