DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne SystemsvsISO 19011
See exactly how DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls map to ISO 19011. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems maps to ISO 19011 with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Software Development Process.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Software Planning Process(1 mappings)
Configuration Management (Table A-8)(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems comparisons
Other ISO 19011 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and ISO 19011?
DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems has 36 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011 covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Software Development Process, where 7 DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls have no direct ISO 19011 equivalent.
How many controls map between DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and ISO 19011?
Of 36 total DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls, 3 map directly to ISO 19011 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems to ISO 19011?
33 DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011. The highest concentration of gaps is in Software Development Process with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and ISO 19011?
The domain with the highest gap count is Software Development Process (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.