DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense InformationvsNIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security
See exactly how DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information maps to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security with 34% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Definitions and Scope.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Definitions and Scope(15 mappings)
Adequate Security Requirements(1 mappings)
Investigation Support(2 mappings)
Flow-Down and Subcontractor Requirements(2 mappings)
+1 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?
DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information has 32 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Definitions and Scope, where 10 DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security equivalent.
How many controls map between DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?
Of 32 total DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls, 11 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?
21 DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Definitions and Scope with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?
The domain with the highest gap count is Definitions and Scope (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.