TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)vsCyber Essentials Plus

See exactly how CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls map to Cyber Essentials Plus. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) maps to Cyber Essentials Plus with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Injection and Input Validation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Authentication(5 mappings)

CWE-269Improper Privilege Management
→CE-PLUS-02Access enforcement and least privilege
CWE-287Improper Authentication
→CE-PLUS-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function
→CE-PLUS-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
CWE-862Missing Authorization
→CE-PLUS-02Access enforcement and least privilege
CWE-863Incorrect Authorization
→CE-PLUS-02Access enforcement and least privilege

Resource Management and Networking(1 mappings)

CWE-798Use of Hard-coded Credentials
→CE-PLUS-03Multi-factor authentication requirements

Related Comparisons

Other CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) comparisons

CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs OWASP API Security Top 10:20236 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)6 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs California IoT Security Law6 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs CSA CCM v46 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)6 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappings

Other Cyber Essentials Plus comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsANSSI Cybersecurity Framework vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs Cyber Essentials Plus18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) and Cyber Essentials Plus?

CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) has 25 controls across its framework, while Cyber Essentials Plus covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Injection and Input Validation, where 7 CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls have no direct Cyber Essentials Plus equivalent.

How many controls map between CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) and Cyber Essentials Plus?

Of 25 total CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls, 6 map directly to Cyber Essentials Plus controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) to Cyber Essentials Plus?

19 CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls have no direct equivalent in Cyber Essentials Plus. The highest concentration of gaps is in Injection and Input Validation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) and Cyber Essentials Plus?

The domain with the highest gap count is Injection and Input Validation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.