Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA CCM v4vsITIL 4

See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to ITIL 4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
156
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA CCM v4 maps to ITIL 4 with 8% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 158 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
ITIL4-03Capacity and availability management
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
ITIL4-03Capacity and availability management
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
ITIL4-03Capacity and availability management

CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(4 mappings)

CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection2 targets
ITIL4-06Change management processes
ITIL4-10Configuration management
CSA-CCC-08Exception management2 targets
ITIL4-06Change management processes
ITIL4-10Configuration management

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(1 mappings)

CSA-CEK-05Encryption change management
ITIL4-06Change management processes

IAM - Identity & Access Management(3 mappings)

CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
ITIL4-15Access management for services
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
ITIL4-15Access management for services
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
ITIL4-15Access management for services

IVS - Infrastructure & Virtualization Security(1 mappings)

CSA-IVS-04OS hardening and base controls
ITIL4-10Configuration management

LOG - Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

CSA-LOG-02Security incident management
ITIL4-11Incident management

SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics(2 mappings)

CSA-SEF-02Service management policy and procedures
ITIL4-11Incident management
CSA-SEF-03Incident response plans
ITIL4-11Incident management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and ITIL 4?

CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while ITIL 4 covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 20 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct ITIL 4 equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and ITIL 4?

Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 13 map directly to ITIL 4 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 158 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to ITIL 4?

158 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in ITIL 4. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and ITIL 4?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.