TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA CCM v4vsHIPAA Security Rule

See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to HIPAA Security Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

47
Controls Mapped
124
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA CCM v4 maps to HIPAA Security Rule with 15% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 146 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(2 mappings)

CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
→314.4(c)(7)Change management
CSA-CCC-08Exception management
→314.4(c)(7)Change management

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(5 mappings)

CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy2 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
CSA-CEK-05Encryption change management
→314.4(c)(7)Change management
CSA-CEK-18Key archival2 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(4 mappings)

CSA-DSP-04Data classification
→NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance
CSA-DSP-09Data protection impact assessment
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
CSA-DSP-16Data retention and deletion
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
CSA-DSP-17Sensitive data protection
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures

HRS - Human Resources(3 mappings)

CSA-HRS-02Acceptable use of technology policy
→NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance
CSA-HRS-11Security awareness training2 targets
→314.4(e)Security awareness training
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(5)Security awareness and training

IAM - Identity & Access Management(6 mappings)

CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures4 targets
→314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(4)Information access management
→HIPAA-164.310(a)(1)Facility access controls
→HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures2 targets
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication

+27 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange46 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments43 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)43 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation43 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework43 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.042 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management42 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges42 mappings

Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons

MDS2 (Medical Device) vs HIPAA Security Rule18 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs HIPAA Security Rule18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HIPAA Security Rule18 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs HIPAA Security Rule18 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs HIPAA Security Rule17 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs HIPAA Security Rule17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs HIPAA Security Rule17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs HIPAA Security Rule16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and HIPAA Security Rule?

CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while HIPAA Security Rule covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 18 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct HIPAA Security Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and HIPAA Security Rule?

Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 25 map directly to HIPAA Security Rule controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 146 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to HIPAA Security Rule?

146 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in HIPAA Security Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and HIPAA Security Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.