Cross-Framework Mapping

COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)vsFull Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio)

See exactly how COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls map to Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) maps to Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio) with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Control Environment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Control Environment(2 mappings)

COSO-IC-CE-01The organization demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values
FRLM-Transformational-4IsTransformational Leadership - The 4 I's (Idealized Influence A+B, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation, Individualized Consideration)
COSO-IC-CE-02The board demonstrates independence from management and exercises oversight of internal control
FRLM-Transformational-4IsTransformational Leadership - The 4 I's (Idealized Influence A+B, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation, Individualized Consideration)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio)?

COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) has 48 controls across its framework, while Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Control Environment, where 14 COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls have no direct Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio) equivalent.

How many controls map between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio)?

Of 48 total COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls, 2 map directly to Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) to Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio)?

46 COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls have no direct equivalent in Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio). The highest concentration of gaps is in Control Environment with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Full Range Leadership Model (Bass & Avolio)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Control Environment (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.