Cross-Framework Mapping

Colorado Privacy Act (CPA)vsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0

See exactly how Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) controls map to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

52
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) maps to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 with 32% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 59 Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Consumer Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 59 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 52 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Sensitive Data and Consent(17 mappings)

AICDA-3.1Consent for Sensitive Data5 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P
PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework
PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained
PF-PR.AC-P1Identity Management and Access Control
PF-PR.AC-P6Individuals Authenticated
AICDA-3.2Children's Data Protections2 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P
PF-CM.AW-P4Data Retention Policies Communicated
CPA-SD-1Sensitive Data Consent2 targets
PF-PR.AC-P1Identity Management and Access Control
PF-PR.AC-P6Individuals Authenticated
CPA-SD-2Children's Data Protection5 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P
PF-CM.AW-P4Data Retention Policies Communicated
PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework
PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained
CPA-SD-3Secondary Use Consent3 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P
PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework
PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained

Controller Obligations(3 mappings)

CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements3 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P
PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework
PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained

+32 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) has 59 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 covers 100 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Consumer Rights, where 21 Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

Of 59 total Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) controls, 19 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

40 Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Consumer Rights with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Consumer Rights (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.