Cross-Framework Mapping

COBIT 2019vsUK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities

See exactly how COBIT 2019 controls map to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
67
Gaps Found
1%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

COBIT 2019 maps to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 COBIT 2019 controls identifies 67 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APO - Align, Plan and Organize.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

BAI - Build, Acquire and Implement(1 mappings)

COBIT-BAI04Managed availability and capacity
FSyP 5.1Reliability and Resilience

Related Comparisons

Other COBIT 2019 comparisons

Other UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 719 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between COBIT 2019 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

COBIT 2019 has 68 controls across its framework, while UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APO - Align, Plan and Organize, where 14 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities equivalent.

How many controls map between COBIT 2019 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

Of 68 total COBIT 2019 controls, 1 map directly to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities controls — representing 1% coverage. The remaining 67 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping COBIT 2019 to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

67 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct equivalent in UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. The highest concentration of gaps is in APO - Align, Plan and Organize with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between COBIT 2019 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

The domain with the highest gap count is APO - Align, Plan and Organize (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.