COBIT 2019vsOECD AI Principles
See exactly how COBIT 2019 controls map to OECD AI Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
COBIT 2019 maps to OECD AI Principles with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 COBIT 2019 controls identifies 67 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APO - Align, Plan and Organize.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
BAI - Build, Acquire and Implement(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other COBIT 2019 comparisons
Other OECD AI Principles comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between COBIT 2019 and OECD AI Principles?
COBIT 2019 has 68 controls across its framework, while OECD AI Principles covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APO - Align, Plan and Organize, where 14 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct OECD AI Principles equivalent.
How many controls map between COBIT 2019 and OECD AI Principles?
Of 68 total COBIT 2019 controls, 1 map directly to OECD AI Principles controls — representing 1% coverage. The remaining 67 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping COBIT 2019 to OECD AI Principles?
67 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct equivalent in OECD AI Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in APO - Align, Plan and Organize with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between COBIT 2019 and OECD AI Principles?
The domain with the highest gap count is APO - Align, Plan and Organize (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.