Cross-Framework Mapping

CMMC 2.0 Level 1vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how CMMC 2.0 Level 1 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 100% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 CMMC 2.0 Level 1 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Information Integrity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(4 mappings)

AC.L1-3.1.1Authorized Access Control
NIST800-AC-2Account management
AC.L1-3.1.2Transaction and Function Control
NIST800-AC-3Access enforcement
AC.L1-3.1.20External Connections
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
AC.L1-3.1.22Control Public Information
NIST800-AC-22Publicly accessible content

Identification and Authentication(2 mappings)

IA.L1-3.5.1Identification
NIST800-IA-2Identification and authentication of organizational users
IA.L1-3.5.2Authentication
NIST800-IA-5Authenticator management

Media Protection(1 mappings)

MP.L1-3.8.3Media Disposal
NIST800-MP-6Media sanitization

Physical Protection(4 mappings)

PE.L1-3.10.1Limit Physical Access
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
PE.L1-3.10.3Escort Visitors
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
PE.L1-3.10.4Physical Access Logs
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
PE.L1-3.10.5Manage Physical Access
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control

System and Communications Protection(2 mappings)

SC.L1-3.13.1Boundary Protection
NIST800-SC-7Boundary protection
SC.L1-3.13.5Public-Access System Separation
NIST800-SC-7Boundary protection

System and Information Integrity(4 mappings)

SI.L1-3.14.1Flaw Remediation
NIST800-SI-2Flaw remediation
SI.L1-3.14.2Malicious Code Protection
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection
SI.L1-3.14.4Update Malicious Code Protection
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection
SI.L1-3.14.5System and File Scanning
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 Level 1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 has 17 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Information Integrity, where 0 CMMC 2.0 Level 1 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 Level 1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 17 total CMMC 2.0 Level 1 controls, 17 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 Level 1 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

0 CMMC 2.0 Level 1 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Information Integrity with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 Level 1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Information Integrity (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.