Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsUK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities with 17% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Account Security(2 mappings)

CPG-1.CUnique Credentials2 targets
FSyP 2.1Security Culture
FSyP 2.2Security Awareness and Engagement

Governance & Training(3 mappings)

CPG-4.BOT Cybersecurity Leadership
FSyP 7.3Protection of Nuclear Technology and Operations
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
FSyP 2.1Security Culture
FSyP 2.2Security Awareness and Engagement

Governance and Training(3 mappings)

CPG-4.BOT Cybersecurity Leadership
FSyP 7.3Protection of Nuclear Technology and Operations
CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
FSyP 2.1Security Culture
FSyP 2.2Security Awareness and Engagement

Supply Chain(2 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting2 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance

Supply Chain and Third Party(4 mappings)

CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting2 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting2 targets
FSyP 4.1Nuclear Supply Chain Management
FSyP 4.2List N Compliance

Network Segmentation(1 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
FSyP 6.2Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 716 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 9 map directly to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

30 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.