CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsPoland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018)
See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018) with 6% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
Data Security(1 mappings)
Supply Chain and Third Party(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Other Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018)?
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018) covers 53 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018) equivalent.
How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018)?
Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 2 map directly to Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018)?
37 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Poland Act on Personal Data Protection (Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych, 2018)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.