Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 357K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 357K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Account Security(2 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control

Data Security(2 mappings)

CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption2 targets
PR.MA-PMaintenance
PR.PO-PData Protection Policies, Processes, and Procedures

Governance & Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control

Governance and Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control

Network Segmentation(1 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (357K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 6 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

33 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.