TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution with 22% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Response and Recovery(2 mappings)

BMA-14Cyber Insurance2 targets
→27557-1Scope
→27557-3Terms and definitions

Account Security(2 mappings)

CPG-1.ADefault Password Change
→23837-1.7.3Authentication and classical post-processing
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
→23837-1.7.3Authentication and classical post-processing

Data Security(8 mappings)

CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest3 targets
→23837-1.2Normative references
→23837-1.5.2Cryptographic module requirements
→23837-1.5.3Network device testing requirements
CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit3 targets
→23837-1.2Normative references
→23837-1.5.2Cryptographic module requirements
→23837-1.5.3Network device testing requirements
DS-1Security Safeguards
→27557-3Terms and definitions
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls
→27557-3Terms and definitions

Governance and Training(1 mappings)

CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training
→23837-1.7.3Authentication and classical post-processing

Supply Chain and Third Party(3 mappings)

CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting3 targets
→23837-1.1Scope
→27557-1Scope
→27557-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange23 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs South Korea ISMS-P19 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202219 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution comparisons

NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsETSI EN 303 645 vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsNIST SP 800-128 vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsDigital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappingsNIST SP 800-183 vs ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 40 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Response and Recovery, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?

Of 40 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 9 map directly to ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?

31 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution. The highest concentration of gaps is in Response and Recovery with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and ISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution?

The domain with the highest gap count is Response and Recovery (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.