Cross-Framework Mapping

China PIPLvsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how China PIPL controls map to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

China PIPL maps to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data with 38% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 China PIPL controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in China PIPL: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

China PIPL: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

PIPL-09Right to data portability
DO-DPL-09Right to data portability

China PIPL: Data Security(16 mappings)

PIPL-13Encryption of personal data4 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
DO-DPL-13Encryption of personal data
PIPL-15Access control for personal data4 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
DO-DPL-15Access control for personal data
PIPL-16Data breach notification requirements5 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
DO-DPL-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-17Security incident response procedures
PIPL-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
DO-DPL-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-17Security incident response procedures
PIPL-18Regular security testing and assessment
DO-DPL-18Regular security testing and assessment

China PIPL: Data Governance(3 mappings)

PIPL-19Data protection officer designation3 targets
DO-DPL-19Data protection officer designation
DO-DPL-21Data protection impact assessments
DO-DPL-22Privacy by design and default

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between China PIPL and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

China PIPL has 29 controls across its framework, while Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in China PIPL: Data Subject Rights, where 6 China PIPL controls have no direct Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between China PIPL and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 29 total China PIPL controls, 11 map directly to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping China PIPL to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

18 China PIPL controls have no direct equivalent in Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in China PIPL: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between China PIPL and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is China PIPL: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.