TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)vsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation

See exactly how Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls map to Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

60
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) maps to Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation with 38% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title III - Consent and Lawful Bases(7 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership7 targets
→Sec. 2Interpretation
→Sec. 23Storage Limitation
→Sec. 25Interpretation
→Sec. 31Unauthorised Disclosure
→Sec. 40Right to Object
→Sec. 55Data Breach Notification
→Sec. 7Responsibilities of Organisation

Title IV - Obligations of Data Controllers and Processors(13 mappings)

Art. 14 quaterProtection by Design and Default3 targets
→Sec. 58Administrative Offences
→Sec. 6Establishment of the Commission
→Sec. 6Establishment of the Commission
Art. 14 sexiesBreach Notification2 targets
→Sec. 25Interpretation
→Sec. 55Data Breach Notification
Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations5 targets
→POFMA-1.1Definitions and Interpretation (Sections 2-3)
→Sec. 2Interpretation
→Sec. 25Interpretation
→Sec. 26Notifiable Data Breaches
→Sec. 3Scope and Application
Art. 15 terData Protection Impact Assessment3 targets
→Sec. 58Administrative Offences
→Sec. 6Establishment of the Commission
→Sec. 6Establishment of the Commission

+40 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) comparisons

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Argentina PDPA14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs APPI14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 202314 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)14 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality14 mappings

Other Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsEU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsMiFID II / MiFIR vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsUzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547) vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsNorth Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020) vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsMalta Data Protection Act (Cap. 586, 2018) vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation14 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation?

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) has 29 controls across its framework, while Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects, where 6 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation equivalent.

How many controls map between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation?

Of 29 total Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls, 11 map directly to Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) to Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation?

18 Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title II - Rights of Data Subjects with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) and Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title II - Rights of Data Subjects (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.