CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)vsSASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)
See exactly how CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls map to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) maps to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) with 28% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Climate Change Performance(2 mappings)
Environmental Performance(6 mappings)
Governance and Strategy(3 mappings)
Metrics, Targets, and Scoring(1 mappings)
Risk Management(8 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) comparisons
Other SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) has 32 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 13 CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls have no direct SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) equivalent.
How many controls map between CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
Of 32 total CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls, 9 map directly to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) to SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
23 CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) and SASB Standards (ISSB Integrated)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.