Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsUS SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework with 47% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(16 mappings)

BS65000-IM-01Resilience Assessment2 targets
CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement2 targets
CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT5 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
US-SEC-DA-SC-01Howey Test Application
US-SEC-DA-SC-02Registration Requirements
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement2 targets
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
US-SEC-DA-SC-03ETF Framework
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications2 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements

Resilience Model(4 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
BS65000-RM-03Leadership and Culture2 targets
CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 10 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 9 map directly to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?

10 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.