Cross-Framework Mapping

Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)vsCzech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.)

See exactly how Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls map to Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) maps to Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.) with 38% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter I: General Provisions(15 mappings)

AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law4 targets
Sec. 10Powers of the Commission
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 26Notifiable Data Breaches
Sec. 3Scope and Application
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions4 targets
Sec. 10Powers of the Commission
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 26Notifiable Data Breaches
Sec. 3Scope and Application
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions7 targets
Sec. 10Powers of the Commission
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 26Notifiable Data Breaches
Sec. 3Scope and Application
Sec. 30Right to Information
Sec. 55Data Breach Notification
Sec. 7Responsibilities of Organisation

Chapter V: Supervisory Authority(5 mappings)

AL-DPA-15Article 19 — Commissioner for Protection of Personal Data2 targets
Sec. 48Establishment of the Office
Sec. 5Functions and Duties of Authority
AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties3 targets
Sec. 48Establishment of the Office
Sec. 50Data Protection Impact Assessment
Sec. 52Data Protection Officer

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) comparisons

Other Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.)?

Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) has 29 controls across its framework, while Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 6 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls have no direct Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.) equivalent.

How many controls map between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.)?

Of 29 total Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls, 11 map directly to Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) to Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.)?

18 Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) controls have no direct equivalent in Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) and Czech Republic Act on the Protection of Personal Data (Act No. 110/2019 Coll.)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.