Cross-Framework Mapping

BIMCO Cyber SecurityvsChina Data Security Law (DSL)

See exactly how BIMCO Cyber Security controls map to China Data Security Law (DSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BIMCO Cyber Security maps to China Data Security Law (DSL) with 25% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 BIMCO Cyber Security controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BIMCO Cyber Security: Asset Identification & Governance(1 mappings)

BIMCO-02System security categorization
DSL-II-01Data Classification and Grading System

BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management(3 mappings)

BIMCO-07Personnel risk assessment3 targets
DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment

BIMCO Cyber Security: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)

BIMCO-17Recovery plan for critical systems
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response
BIMCO-18Reporting obligations to authorities
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response
BIMCO-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
DSL-IV-02Risk Monitoring and Incident Response

BIMCO Cyber Security: Supply Chain & Configuration(3 mappings)

BIMCO-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems3 targets
DSL-III-01Data Security Risk Assessment
DSL-III-02Data Security Emergency Response
DSL-IV-03Important Data Risk Assessment

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BIMCO Cyber Security and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

BIMCO Cyber Security has 24 controls across its framework, while China Data Security Law (DSL) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security, where 5 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct China Data Security Law (DSL) equivalent.

How many controls map between BIMCO Cyber Security and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

Of 24 total BIMCO Cyber Security controls, 6 map directly to China Data Security Law (DSL) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BIMCO Cyber Security to China Data Security Law (DSL)?

18 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct equivalent in China Data Security Law (DSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BIMCO Cyber Security and China Data Security Law (DSL)?

The domain with the highest gap count is BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.