TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)vsPropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity

See exactly how Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls map to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) maps to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity with 36% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title 1: General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title 3: Specific Processing Situations(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing2 targets
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection
→PTSS-4.2Data Minimization

Title 4: Remedies and Penalties(3 mappings)

BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines2 targets
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection
→PTSS-4.2Data Minimization
BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection

Title 1, Chapter II: Principles Relating to Processing(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data2 targets
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection
→PTSS-4.2Data Minimization

Title 2: Data Protection Authority(1 mappings)

BE-DPA-7Article 23 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Greece Law 4624/2019 — Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) Implementation Act7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Ethiopia Personal Data Protection Proclamation (No. 1321/2024)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010)7 mappingsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) vs Kuwait Data Privacy Protection Regulation (KDPPR, 2021 — CMA Directive)7 mappings

Other PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title 1: General Provisions, where 3 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

Of 14 total Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls, 5 map directly to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

9 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title 1: General Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title 1: General Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.