Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)vsJordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)

See exactly how Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls map to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) maps to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) with 50% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title 1: General Provisions(8 mappings)

BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art.8Prohibited Acts
Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions4 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art.8Prohibited Acts
Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope

Title 3: Specific Processing Situations(4 mappings)

BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing4 targets
Art.6Right of Access
Art.7Right to Rectification
JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1–2)
PY-2Definitions

Title 4: Remedies and Penalties(7 mappings)

BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines4 targets
Art.6Right of Access
Art.7Right to Rectification
JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1–2)
PY-2Definitions
BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties3 targets
JOR-11Penalties (Article 22–24)
JOR-3Establishment of Committee (Article 4)
JOR-4Committee Functions (Article 5–6)

Title 1, Chapter II: Principles Relating to Processing(1 mappings)

BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data
Art.6Right of Access

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Other Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations, where 2 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

Of 14 total Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls, 7 map directly to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

7 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). The highest concentration of gaps is in Title 3: Specific Processing Situations with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title 3: Specific Processing Situations (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.