Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security with 34% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(4 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-03Access Controls
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-03Access Controls
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-03Access Controls

Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection(2 mappings)

BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(11 mappings)

BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
BE-CF-14Vulnerability scanning and management
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
BE-CF-15Security categorization3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy4 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(3 mappings)

BE-CF-20Incident reporting and notification2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
BE-CF-21Forensic analysis capabilities
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 5 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 11 map directly to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

21 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.