Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsNIST SP 800-145

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to NIST SP 800-145. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to NIST SP 800-145 with 56% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(3 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
NIST145-06Cloud identity management
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
NIST145-08Privileged access in cloud environments
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
NIST145-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud

Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection(1 mappings)

BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data
NIST145-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(6 mappings)

BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures
NIST145-03Cloud risk assessment
BE-CF-14Vulnerability scanning and management
NIST145-23Cloud vulnerability management
BE-CF-15Security categorization2 targets
NIST145-03Cloud risk assessment
NIST145-11Data classification for cloud
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy2 targets
NIST145-03Cloud risk assessment
NIST145-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(3 mappings)

BE-CF-20Incident reporting and notification
NIST145-22Incident response in cloud
BE-CF-21Forensic analysis capabilities
NIST145-22Incident response in cloud
BE-CF-22Lessons learned and improvement
NIST145-22Incident response in cloud

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Configuration Management(7 mappings)

BE-CF-23Baseline configuration establishment2 targets
NIST145-19Image and template hardening
NIST145-20Cloud configuration management
BE-CF-24Configuration change control
NIST145-24Cloud change management
BE-CF-25Security impact analysis2 targets
NIST145-19Image and template hardening
NIST145-20Cloud configuration management
BE-CF-26System component inventory2 targets
NIST145-19Image and template hardening
NIST145-20Cloud configuration management

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-145?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-145 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 5 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct NIST SP 800-145 equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-145?

Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 18 map directly to NIST SP 800-145 controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to NIST SP 800-145?

14 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-145. The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and NIST SP 800-145?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.