Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsEuropean Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) with 25% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(1 mappings)

BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(12 mappings)

BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
BE-CF-14Vulnerability scanning and management
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
BE-CF-15Security categorization3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy5 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
EU-EAA-PSA-03Disproportionate Burden Exception
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(6 mappings)

BE-CF-20Incident reporting and notification2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
BE-CF-21Forensic analysis capabilities2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
BE-CF-22Lessons learned and improvement2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 6 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?

Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 8 map directly to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?

24 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882). The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.