Belgium CyberFundamentalsvsChina Data Security Law (DSL)
See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to China Data Security Law (DSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to China Data Security Law (DSL) with 19% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(10 mappings)
Belgium CyberFundamentals: Incident Response(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons
Other China Data Security Law (DSL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
Belgium CyberFundamentals has 32 controls across its framework, while China Data Security Law (DSL) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection, where 6 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct China Data Security Law (DSL) equivalent.
How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
Of 32 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 6 map directly to China Data Security Law (DSL) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to China Data Security Law (DSL)?
26 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in China Data Security Law (DSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and China Data Security Law (DSL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.