TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium CyberFundamentalsvs3GPP Security

See exactly how Belgium CyberFundamentals controls map to 3GPP Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium CyberFundamentals maps to 3GPP Security with 18% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 56 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 56 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Access Control & Identity(10 mappings)

BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning3 targets
→3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
→3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
→3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege3 targets
→3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
→3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
→3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
→3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification3 targets
→3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
→3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
→3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management

Belgium CyberFundamentals: System & Communications Protection(5 mappings)

BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data5 targets
→3GPP-SEC-17Encryption of data at rest
→3GPP-SEC-18Encryption of data in transit
→3GPP-SEC-19Certificate management
→3GPP-SEC-20Key lifecycle management
→TS33.501-13.2NF Service Authorization

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Risk Assessment & Management(2 mappings)

BE-CF-14Vulnerability scanning and management
→3GPP-SEC-25Technical vulnerability management
BE-CF-15Security categorization
→3GPP-SEC-08Information classification and labeling

Belgium CyberFundamentals: Audit & Accountability(3 mappings)

BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage
→3GPP-SEC-24Logging and monitoring
BE-CF-29Audit record review and analysis
→3GPP-SEC-24Logging and monitoring
BE-CF-31Audit log protection and retention
→3GPP-SEC-24Logging and monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs ANSSI Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST SP 800-17120 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture20 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST SP 800-17220 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs BSI IT-Grundschutz20 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs Saudi NCA ECC20 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs FISMA20 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs Cyber Essentials Plus20 mappings

Other 3GPP Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-150 vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsNIST SP 800-137 vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsNIST SP 800-207 vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsNIST SP 800-218 vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsNIST SP 800-123 vs 3GPP Security17 mappingsBSIMM vs 3GPP Security17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Belgium CyberFundamentals and 3GPP Security?

Belgium CyberFundamentals has 56 controls across its framework, while 3GPP Security covers 71 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect, where 7 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct 3GPP Security equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium CyberFundamentals and 3GPP Security?

Of 56 total Belgium CyberFundamentals controls, 10 map directly to 3GPP Security controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium CyberFundamentals to 3GPP Security?

46 Belgium CyberFundamentals controls have no direct equivalent in 3GPP Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium CyberFundamentals and 3GPP Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.