Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsNIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security with 28% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Operational Resilience.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
MD124-CTL-04OS and Application Updates
MD124-POL-02BYOD Policy
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy

BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls(6 mappings)

BCBS239-06Network security and segmentation2 targets
MD124-CTL-06Network Security for Mobile
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication
BCBS239-07Endpoint protection and detection
MD124-POL-01Mobile Device Security Policy
BCBS239-09Encryption and key management3 targets
MD124-CTL-02Device Encryption
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Operational Resilience, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?

18 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Operational Resilience with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Operational Resilience (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.