Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(6 mappings)

BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures2 targets
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 8 map directly to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

17 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Information Security Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Information Security Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.