Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines with 48% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)

BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management

BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls(4 mappings)

BCBS239-06Network security and segmentation2 targets
ICS-NS-1Network segmentation
ICS-NS-5Network monitoring and intrusion detection
BCBS239-09Encryption and key management
ICS-NS-3Remote access security
BCBS239-10Secure configuration standards
ICS-PM-2System hardening

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(7 mappings)

BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures3 targets
AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
ICS-PM-1ICS patch management programme
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
ICS-PM-1ICS patch management programme
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
ICS-PM-1ICS patch management programme

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(7 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment3 targets
AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement
AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 12 map directly to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

13 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.