Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsNIST SP 800-137

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to NIST SP 800-137. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
44
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to NIST SP 800-137 with 19% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition
NISTSP137-1ISCM Strategy, Governance, and Volatility Assessment

Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ASB-06Cloud identity management
NISTSP137-6Malware, Identity Access, and Network Boundary Monitoring
ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
NISTSP137-6Malware, Identity Access, and Network Boundary Monitoring
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
NISTSP137-6Malware, Identity Access, and Network Boundary Monitoring

Azure Security Benchmark: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

ASB-11Data classification for cloud
NISTSP137-1ISCM Strategy, Governance, and Volatility Assessment
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NISTSP137-5Vulnerability + Patch + Configuration Status Monitoring
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NISTSP137-7Incident Response Integration and Ongoing Authorization

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

ASB-16Virtual network segmentation
NISTSP137-6Malware, Identity Access, and Network Boundary Monitoring

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

ASB-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
NISTSP137-4Security Status Reporting and Risk Score Aggregation
ASB-23Cloud vulnerability management
NISTSP137-5Vulnerability + Patch + Configuration Status Monitoring

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-137?

Azure Security Benchmark has 54 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-137 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity Management, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct NIST SP 800-137 equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-137?

Of 54 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-137 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to NIST SP 800-137?

44 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-137. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-137?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.