Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsNIST SP 800-122

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to NIST SP 800-122. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to NIST SP 800-122 with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

ASB-03Cloud risk assessment
NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance
ASB-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance

Azure Security Benchmark: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
NISTSP122-5PII Security Controls - Encryption, Access Control, Storage, Audit
NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance
ASB-13Data residency and sovereignty
NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

ASB-22Incident response in cloud
NISTSP122-6PII Breach Response and Incident Handling

DevOps Security(4 mappings)

DS-2Ensure Inventory of Software Components in Code4 targets
NISTSP122-3PII Data Subject Rights and Automated Decision-Making
NISTSP122-4PII Minimisation, Purpose Limitation, and Pseudonymisation
NISTSP122-5PII Security Controls - Encryption, Access Control, Storage, Audit
NISTSP122-6PII Breach Response and Incident Handling

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-122?

Azure Security Benchmark has 54 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-122 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity Management, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct NIST SP 800-122 equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-122?

Of 54 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-122 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to NIST SP 800-122?

47 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-122. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and NIST SP 800-122?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.