Cross-Framework Mapping

Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010)vsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)

See exactly how Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) controls map to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) maps to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) with 33% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section III: Collection and Processing of Personal Data.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Section IV: Cross-Border Transfer and Protection(6 mappings)

AZ-DPA-12Article 13 — Cross-Border Transfer6 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 29Safety Measures
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 64Transfer Based on Adequacy Decision

Section V: Liability and Final Provisions(12 mappings)

AZ-DPA-14Article 16 — Liability for Violations5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 29Safety Measures
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
AZ-DPA-15Article 17 — Dispute Resolution7 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 29Safety Measures
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 45Data Protection Officer
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 64Transfer Based on Adequacy Decision

Section I: General Provisions(2 mappings)

AZ-DPA-2Article 2 — Basic Concepts2 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
Art. 2Consent Definition

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) comparisons

Other Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) has 15 controls across its framework, while Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section III: Collection and Processing of Personal Data, where 4 Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) controls have no direct Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Of 15 total Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) controls, 5 map directly to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

10 Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) controls have no direct equivalent in Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Section III: Collection and Processing of Personal Data with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azerbaijan Law on Personal Data (2010) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section III: Collection and Processing of Personal Data (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.